October 18, 2018, 01:33:34 PM *
Ahoy, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Our users have posted a total of 13225 posts.
This forum contains 11453 topics.
We have 1820 registered users.
Please welcome DoraGissing, our newest member.
News: Hello and welcome to our forum
 
  Home :: Help :: Search :: Login :: Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1  Alliance General Talk / Alliance Stance / Re: riders from hell on: July 15, 2009, 04:33:14 AM
k
2  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Players on: January 26, 2009, 06:54:11 AM
Never heard of buddy-fogging? That is, after all how uber's kiddies were usually fogged. Still, I'll assume none of it was buddy'd.
 Ooh, there's like three people with the balls to actually attack anyone, and they aren't even doing much damage! OMG, this is great warfare!
Also, the rank 1 and 3 (maybe 4, cbf checking) alliances are lead by the same person.

Why suggest things? Emi either isn't here or doesn't give a damn, or he would've done something by now.
Face it, sea-o was always the neglected side-project, and even Space Odyssey is failing now.
Also, this thread isn't in the suggestions area, so I don't feel the need to make any.

The ones hitting me/being hit by me are active, because they're logging in everyday and replacing their ships, etc. Half of them just don't know how to play.. And this is the rank 20-30 players. I shouldn't need to play for growth for freaking ages just to grind up to the few players who could actually make it interesting. Believe it or not, nobody wants to play a game that is mostly GRINDAN punctuated with the occasional battles that are screwed and limited by stupid tweaks and "updates" made to said game. But again, Emi either doesn't care or isn't here.
I'm just logging in for like 10 minutes and using pre-existing ships. Screw grinding missions, encounters, etc.

Quote
Last Active:     January 07, 2009, 06:19:34 AM
Cool activity for the sole admin, bro.
3  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Players on: January 25, 2009, 04:40:48 AM
Power up a bit then ;p
cbf putting in the time and effort to build up, to be facing like 4 people and their alts.
Especially not with everyone playing bum-chums. :/
4  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Players on: January 24, 2009, 07:13:19 AM
2009-01-21 04:50:50
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 2002 of your ships and lost 3381536 ships.
You spent 2.101.487.045 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+3500 Exp)



2009-01-21 04:55:31
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

Captain Ron(#18756) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
Captain Ron(#18756) destroyed 4290 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
210 ships from zephyrblade(#463) Barrel Decoy fleet captured during battle.
190 ships from zephyrblade(#463) Barrel Decoy fleet captured during battle.
110 ships from zephyrblade(#463) Barrel Decoy fleet captured during battle.
200 ships from zephyrblade(#463) Barrel Decoy fleet captured during battle.
You spent 19.064.430.000 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
Captain Ron(#18756)s attack failed.
Captain Ron(#18756) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-21 05:01:25
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

Captain Ron(#18756) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
Captain Ron(#18756) destroyed 2760 of your ships and lost 2 ships.
240 ships from zephyrblade(#463) Barrel Decoy fleet captured during battle.
You spent 19.966.177.539 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
Captain Ron(#18756)s attack failed.
Captain Ron(#18756) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-21 05:05:22
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

Captain Ron(#18756) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
Captain Ron(#18756) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
You spent 19.064.430.000 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
Captain Ron(#18756)s attack failed.
Captain Ron(#18756) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



:|
5  Sea Odyssey Info Terminal / F.A.Q. & Troubleshooting / Re: EXP on the ships on: January 20, 2009, 09:07:27 PM
it will increase attack and defence. If it has less then that, it will increase attack and defence.
DOES NOT COMPUTE
6  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Players on: January 20, 2009, 02:50:25 AM
I haven't been here since december (or was it November?), and this is the best excuse for a pummeling the "active" players have to offer?
2008-12-08 06:50:39
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

541474(#30637) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
541474(#30637) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
541474(#30637)s attack failed.
541474(#30637) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2008-12-19 21:00:06
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

DONG786(#34516) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
DONG786(#34516) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 4 ships.
DONG786(#34516)s attack failed.
DONG786(#34516) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2008-12-25 17:31:12
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

slivermist(#32976) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
slivermist(#32976) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
slivermist(#32976)s attack failed.
slivermist(#32976) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2008-12-26 19:18:28
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

0541474(#30612) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
0541474(#30612) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
0541474(#30612)s attack failed.
0541474(#30612) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2008-12-26 19:19:02
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

0541474(#30612) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
0541474(#30612) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
0541474(#30612)s attack failed.
0541474(#30612) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-02 18:48:04
REMOTE ATTACK - SCOUT!!!

Scouting party identified as belonging to Captain Ron(#18756).
The enemy could not locate your secret base.
You ambushed Captain Ron(#18756) scouting party.
Captain Ron(#18756) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 6 ships.


2009-01-07 21:37:29
FULL ASSAULT - BOARD!!!

Dekar(#35912) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
Dekar(#35912) destroyed 1 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
Dekar(#35912)s attack failed.
Dekar(#35912) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-07 21:38:00
Evaded Attack!

Dekar(#35912)'s fleet and commandShip tried to attack your commandShip.
Your slim commandShip helm was able to evade the attacking commandShip.
You are safe for now... but your hasty retreat got you into unknown territory...

2009-01-10 16:02:16
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 4 of your ships and lost 1105 ships.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347)s attack was a hard blow, but your forces repelled it.
(+3500 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:05:07
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 4 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
You spent 2.519.711.557 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:09:16
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 3 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
You spent 2.607.882.750 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:10:23
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 3 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
You spent 1.385.504.726 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:11:19
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

dz796(#18347) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 3 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:12:08
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

dz796(#18347) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 4 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:13:05
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

dz796(#18347) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 4 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-10 16:15:08
REMOTE ATTACK - BOARD!!!

dz796(#18347) boarded your fleet and commandShip.
dz796(#18347) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
You spent 1.525.149.229 credits to ressuply the fleets with sailors.
dz796(#18347)s attack failed.
dz796(#18347) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-16 09:43:40
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

GeoForce(#30637) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
GeoForce(#30637) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
GeoForce(#30637)s attack failed.
GeoForce(#30637) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-17 17:28:47
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

n-solo(#37245) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
n-solo(#37245) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
n-solo(#37245)s attack failed.
n-solo(#37245) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-17 17:30:12
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

n-solo(#37245) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
n-solo(#37245) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 0 ships.
n-solo(#37245)s attack failed.
n-solo(#37245) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-17 19:10:52
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

n-solo(#37245) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
n-solo(#37245) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 1 ships.
n-solo(#37245)s attack failed.
n-solo(#37245) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+10 Exp)



2009-01-18 16:54:16
REMOTE ATTACK - REGULAR!!!

n-solo(#37245) attacked your command ship from deep sea.
n-solo(#37245) destroyed 0 of your ships and lost 985296 ships.
n-solo(#37245)s attack failed.
n-solo(#37245) fleet was no match for your forces.
(+1717 Exp)

Wat
7  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Players on: November 07, 2008, 03:55:11 AM
what we need is some real enemys..
Then don't make buddies with everyone who gets powerful!
Also, let people who want to be your enemies act as such, lol.


You will get 1 turn every 1 minute.

2 people online
=
Myself (logging in once a week)
+
A random noob who doesn't seem to do anything (See Myself)
= Not good 'nuff guise.
8  Feedback Terminal / "Bugs" and Problems / Re: Design system = LOLWUT-BROKEN? on: September 16, 2008, 09:09:39 PM
ah, i see thats fine then i geuss..


each weapon reduses the attack by 1% so you got to take that into account when making the weapons.. - i was clone ships across games a while back and ran into the same problem... the 1% reduced was for some reason showing when i was caculating it too, but it was easy to fix, times the weapon by 101% (1.01) then add that in as the attack.. i think - if not maybe the 2 games are slightly different?
Ah yes, I  think I remember the complaining when that was added.
I see what you thought I meant though, thanks for trying to help.
9  Feedback Terminal / "Bugs" and Problems / Re: Design system = LOLWUT-BROKEN? on: September 16, 2008, 02:35:56 AM

oh and maybe you should just clone the ship rather than trying to copy it and steal the design from whoever made it? isnt it kinda against the rules to remake someone elses ship for your own to avoid giving royaltys and maybe steal some of their customers?
Not sure it is a rule,
Kinda cheap tho, huh zephy?
No.
You never know who owns that ship design, and of course there's certain people you wouldn't want to give royalties to.
And given that they're designs made by spaceo players, not sea-o originals, in most cases those royalties aren't going to the original designer anyway.
But waylain, I'm not here to debate the morals of it, you're head mod, you should know to stay on topic.

Quote
attack i belive it takes effect IN the gold account aswell - you got to consider each weapon costs 1% of the attack, so when building a copy of it you need to take into consideration to make the weapon bigger than it appears... i think...
Please clarify that.
Also, gold account? What does that have to do with it? I was using the upgrade fleet section to get the blueprints. Unless my gold account is reducing the cost of part upgrades by over 99%, the gold isn't having have any effect, AFAIK. 
10  Feedback Terminal / "Bugs" and Problems / Re: Design system = LOLWUT-BROKEN? on: September 15, 2008, 07:21:07 AM
hmm im kinda confused with what you said, in other words you cloned parts from another ship and upgraded, but the price ended up being higher than it should of with the exact same parts on the exact same hull size of a differnt ship? what ship were you trying to copy, maybe you had to much weight on the hull... or one to many upgrades or the wrong ones?

if not you should know by now to mail emi directly - he tends not to be to responsive on the fourms :p
No. This is without adding them to the ships. I was just getting the part's design specs from upgrade fleet.
I was copying the design specs exactly to design the same part myself, and it was giving me a different price for the part than it did the other designer.
Like instead of 1 to 3 credits, it'd be much higher, in the thousands or whatever.
I checked for typing errors, etc. There were none.

This wasn't directly for emi, hence the "wth guise?"
11  Feedback Terminal / "Bugs" and Problems / Design system = LOLWUT-BROKEN? on: September 14, 2008, 04:02:59 AM
Ok, so I look up both a powercore and armour design that I wish to copy, right?
I used the upgrade fleet room trick to do it, so bonuses shouldn't be altering it.
Then, when I put the exact same design specs in the Design form and submit, the price is much higher than it should be, and different to the price listed in the upgrade fleet section.
Wth guise?
12  Sea Odyssey Info Terminal / F.A.Q. & Troubleshooting / Re: html codes on: September 01, 2008, 02:33:10 AM
i know that, i use Slash kings source but i dont know how to chnage it so its the song i want, thats the problem
Do you want just songs or the video as well?
If you just want to embed a "mini-player" or whatever for songs, mail me in-game and I'll give you a hand with that.
13  Sea Odyssey Caffe / Whatever / Re: Best movie of all time? on: August 28, 2008, 03:35:20 AM
Exactly
I tried to google but to no avail
Did you try google images?
14  General Category / Report Abuse / Emi impersonation on: August 15, 2008, 11:21:22 PM
46             emi (#1) (#31738)     3922     30001                     11.807.686

A member of the "anti-emi" alliance.
Against the ToS, correct?
15  General Category / Design and Helpful Information / Re: Supership Design on: August 15, 2008, 03:52:56 AM
I agree with uber, the attack is a little high.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines
Theme Pirates By Aku